You film the sprint from the side. A cone placed beside the finish line does not fall where you think: from where the camera stands it looks displaced, and the time you read is wrong. Enter your numbers below and the tool tells you at which metre to place each cone, so that on video it falls exactly on the real finish line. The camera sits on a tripod, fixed in one spot, and only pivots on the spot to follow the athlete.
The numbers are yours
What you have calculated stays yours: you need not leave anything to use it. But if you want an opinion on those numbers — what they say, what they do not say, and what to work on first — leave me your email and I will reply myself, personally.
The address is only used to reply to you: no third-party service, nothing passed on to anyone. Privacy
Got it. I will write to you myself, usually within a couple of days.
It did not go through. Try again, or write to me from the contacts on the home page.
| Finish line | Where to place the cone | By how much you shift it |
|---|
The camera sees along rays: anything lying on the same line between its lens and a point ends up on top of that point in the video. The cone, though, you cannot put inside the lane, so you put it to one side. And a cone placed to one side, at the same metre as the finish line, sits on a different ray: in the video it appears displaced, and the time you read is wrong. The fix is to shift the cone along the track until it is back on the right ray: by how much depends on where you put the camera, and that is what this tool works out.
As a formula: x_cono = x_cam + (traguardo − x_cam) · D_coni / D, with D the camera–lane distance and D_coni = D ∓ Δd the camera–cone-line distance. If Δd exceeds D the cones would fall on the camera or behind it: in that case move them closer to the lane.
The markers are the calibration: testing is the step after. A day of splits and acceleration profiling for your group.
Let's talk →